Technology has come a long way for a reason. My 2009 honda is so much better than my 2006. Why in the world would a two stroke be more fun than my 450?
First bike I ever bought was a 2000 yz250 in 2006. Fun Fun Fun, railing through the woods, feeling like I was going fast. But in reality, I sucked, especially on a motocross track. Fast forward to 2010, and Im pretty decent albiet Ive been riding 450s since I bought a "real" bike in 2006. I listen to the jibber jabber, oh smokers are so fun, yada yada yada. So me, thinking yall old bastards are right, I go and buy a 2010 yz250. Lets get the newest updated version, and supposedly the best 250 smoker out there. Is it fun?
Hell no. I get more arm pump than Ronnie Coleman jerking off to a bodybuilding porno. I go from being a decent over 30 A rider to a novice instantly. I nearly kill myself 100 times. No 300 times.
My 450 is no slouch, its got a worked motor and makes 62hp to the wheel. Im a big guy at 215lbs and I love my 450. So really, the question is, why in the hell would you want to buy some old technology, when these damn things have fuel injection and the big four putting all their efforts into making these bikes fast? 4 strokes killed our sport....says who? The slow guy with the old pre mix bike? I just dont get it. Maybe I havent spent enough time with my new bike.
That being said, I have a wonderfully new and mint 2010 yz250 with 7.3 hours on it for sale. I have all my stock parts too, even springs, and I'll throw in a skid plate and some sprockets. There has got to be some old man with a midlife crisis wanting to relive the old days....and save me from a bike I resent more and more with each passing day.....








Reply With Quote

Bookmarks